Comparative Evaluation of Warm, Buffered Articaine and Buffered Articaine for buccal infiltration of Primary tooth for Pulp therapy procedures: A split mouth design clinical trial.

Comparative evaluation of warm, buffered articaine vs buffered articaine for buccal infiltration of primary tooth for pulp therapy procedures: a split mouth design clinical trial. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/10/095883

Enrollment

Registered

2025-10-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: warm buffered articaine: 1.8 ml 0f Articaine will be taken 0.18 ml will be taken out and 0.18 ml of sodium bicarbonate will be added and the buffered articaine will be warmed using baby

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children exhibiting Frankel s behavior rating of grade 3 and 4 (Positive and Definitely Positive) Children with bilateral deep caries with pulpal exposure Class I and class II relying on ASA classification

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Considerable behavior problems Children with systemic conditions Parents who refuse to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Identify which method of Local Anesthetic administration is less painful using Wong bakers pain scale at baselineTimepoint: Before Administration Of LA during Administration of LA At baseline after administration of LA	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: Nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrVeena Arali

Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College

empendurkar@gmail.com8355803238

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026