Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation Of Different Caries Detection Methods After Cavity Preparation - An Invivo Study

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF VISUAL TACTILE METHOD VERSUS CARIES DETECTOR DYE IN DETECTION OF CARIES AFTER CAVITY PREPARATION AGAINST LASER FLUORESCENCE DEVICE (DIAGNODENT): AN IN-VIVO STUDY - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/095499
Enrollment
48
Registered
2025-09-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K026- Dental caries on smooth surface

Interventions

Intervention1: caries detection after cavity preparation: class 2 cavity preparation will be done followed by evaluation with three caries detection methods. duration- done on first day, 1hour Interve

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Moderate class II caries involved in posterior teeth (permanent premolars and molars) Moderate caries risk Presence of at least one open carious lesion into dentin on occlusal surface

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Primary/mixed dentition High caries risk Teeth with restorations Pulp involvement and periapical pathology Teeth with development anomalies and disturbances

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
caries detection methods like visual tactile examination, caries detector dyes, DIAGNOdent(laser fluorescence device) can effectively detect caries in cavities and ensure complete caries removal particularly in proximal areasTimepoint: Diagnodent(LF) values before and after cavity preparation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBoddepalli Divya

ANIL NEERUKONDA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES

padmabrajeswari@gmail.com9182243709

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026