Skip to content

A Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Myo Fatige Forte Supplementation and Physiotherapy in Managing Chronic Lower Back Pain

Comparative Efficacy of Myo Fatige Forte Tablet Palmitoylethanolamide Supplementation over physiotherapy in the management of chronic lower back pain A randomized control Bi centric trial - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/095498
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-09-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M99-M99- Biomechanical lesions, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: Myofatigue Forte Tablets: It is a combination of Palmitoylethanolamide and Acetyl-L-Carnitine which are Nutraceuticals that have demonstrated analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties

Sponsors

Fourrts (India) Laboratories Pvt.Limited
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18-65 years. Clinical diagnosis of chronic lower back pain lasting more than three months. Minimum pain intensity of 4 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline. Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study protocols Degenerative discs disease without prolapses

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Acute pain conditions or recent injury within the last three months. History of spinal surgery within the past six months. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Severe comorbidities that could interfere with study outcomes. Participation in other clinical trials for lower back pain. Participants with Disc Prolapse, Lysis, Listhesis, Trauma, Tumors, Inflammatory pathologies are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in pain intensity measured by the visual Analog scale (VAS) and questionaries from Week 0 Baseline visit Week 2 In person assessment Week 4 In person assessment Week 6 Telephonic check in Week 8 Inperson assessment Week 10 Telephonic check in Week 12 Final in person assessment This endpoint will help to determine the primary effectiveness of PEA versus physical therapy in alleviating pain.Timepoint: Change in pain intensity measured by the visual Analog scale (VAS) and questionaries from Week 0 Baseline visit Week 2 In person assessment Week 4 In person assessment Week 6 Telephonic check in Week 8 Inperson assessment Week 10 Telephonic check in Week 12 Final in person assessment This endpoint will help to determine the primary effectiveness of PEA versus physical therapy in alleviating pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional improvement, accessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) which evaluates the degree of disability related to lower back pain. Quality of life evaluated, using short form health survey (SF-36), RMDQ which matches health-related quality of life across multiple domains. Timepoint: Week 0 Baseline visit Week 2 In person assessment Week 4 In person assessment Week 6 Telephonic check in Week 8 In person assessment Week 10 Telephonic check in Week 12 Final in person assessment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr G Sudhir

Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research

spinesurgeonsudhir@sriramachandra.edu.in09962277126

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026