Skip to content

Comparing retrolaminar vs paravertebral block post operative pain relief in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery patients

Efficacy of retrolaminar and paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients - A double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/095301
Enrollment
104
Registered
2025-09-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N289- Disorder of kidney and ureter, unspecified Health Condition 2: N288- Other specified disorders of kidney and ureter

Interventions

Intervention1: Retrolaminar block: Retrolaminar block is given at level of T10. the spinous process and adjacent lamina of target thoracic vertebra is identified. Under strict aseptic precautions , 23

Sponsors

Dharshini K
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA PS I, II and III 2. Patient posted for elective PCNL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient not giving consent obesity allergy to drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of postoperative anlagesia provided by retrolaminar block verus paravertebral block in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomyTimepoint: first 24 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain scoresTimepoint: postoperative period first 24 hours;Total rescue analgesic consumptionTimepoint: postoperative period first 24 hours;Block related complicationsTimepoint: postoperative period first 24 hours

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDharshini K

Sri Manakula Vinayagar medical College and Hospital

dilipchander2000@gmail.com9993031202

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026