Skip to content

Comparison of Three Dental Materials for Protecting the Pulp in Deep Tooth Decay: An In Vivo Study

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of Nanohydroxyapatite-Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and TheraCal LC as indirect pulp capping agent in deep dental caries-An in vivo study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/095189
Enrollment
38
Registered
2025-09-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nanohydroxyapatite-Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement: Nanohydroxyapatite-Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement improves the property of glass ionomer cement and reduces the side effects Con

Sponsors

Tiyasha Roy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Posterior teeth with deep carious lesion Teeth with vital pulp Teeth with fully formed apices Age group -18-40 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Oral habits like bruxism, parafunctional habits and abnormal occlusion. Teeth with periapical pathology Teeth with swelling or fistula, periapical or bifurcation radiolucency Teeth with external and internal resorption The teeth with spontaneous pain. Any previous restoration, Fractured restoration and replacement restoration Presence of fracture line in a tooth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Absence of Pain and sensitivity Positive for vitality test No tenderness to percussion No periapical changes No secondary caries progression No swelling Timepoint: 1 month, 3 month and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactTiyasha Roy

Guru Nanak Institute Of Dental Sciences and Research

headcons.gnidsr@jisgroup.org9831029606

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026