FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Automated Blood Tests and Traditional Blood Smear Examination in Anemia Patients.

Correlation between Automated CBC Analysis and Conventional Peripheral Blood Smear Assessment in anaemia patients - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/094924
Enrollment
365
Registered
2025-09-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: D50-D89- Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (DMIHER)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All adult patients with anaemia defined as per WHO reference ranges : 1. Hb less than 13 gm/dl (men) 2. Hb less than 12gm/dl (women) 3. Hb less than 11gm/dl (pregnant women)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Clotted blood sample. 2. Cases in which no consensus will be reached between the observers on microscopy. 3. Artefactual changes in red cells obscuring and altering morphological features.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the correlation and comparison between automated CBC analysis (including RBC indices and histograms) and conventional peripheral blood smear assessment in the characterization and classification of anaemia.Timepoint: 2 years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Keshao Madhukarrao Hiwale

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

keshaohiwale5@gmail.com9823749905

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026