Skip to content

COMPARISION OF INTUBATION CHARACTERISTICS IN TWO DIFFERENT POSITIONS - RAMPED VERSUS SNIFFING USING VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE IN OBESE PATIENTS

A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RAMPED VERSUS SNIFFING POSITION IN TERMS OF INTUBATION CHARACTERSTICS DURING VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY GUIDED INTUBATION IN OBESE PATIENTS AT SAWAI MAN SINGH MEDICAL COLLEGE JAIPUR. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/094813
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-09-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Video laryngoscopy guided intubation in sniffing position: Video laryngoscopy guided intubation in ramped position Intervention2: Intubation in ramped versus sniffing position.: We will

Sponsors

Department of anaesthesia Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Attached Hospital Jaipur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Obese patients [BMI25- 30 kg/m (according to WHO for Asian population) undergoing elective surgeries under General Anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation. Patients willing to participate and giving informed written consent. Age more than 18 years. ASA I & II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any patient with history of difficult intubation. Patient taking part in any other study. Previous head and neck surgery or cervical spine defect. The need for awake oral or nasal intubation. Patient with acute respiratory infections. Mallampatti Grade Class 4, Restricted mouth opening less than 2 fingers, Presence of any growth or tumor in oral cavity or pharynx.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess and compare the intubation time between ramped versus sniffing 2. To assess and compare IDS( Indubation Difficulty Scale) score between the two groups Timepoint: Assessment will start at baseline from insertion of the video laryngoscope between teeth until successful intubation is confirmed by detecting end tidal carbondioxide.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To assess and compare difficulty in mask ventilation using warters scale between the two groups. 2.To assess and compare the airway relayed complications in both groups.Timepoint: From inducing patient till successful tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscope

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Paras Gupta

Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Attached Hospital

drmamtasharma@hotmail.com9829566077

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026