FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Buffered Lignocaine and Buffered Articaine for Pain Control in Mandibular Gum Surgery: A Study in Adults

Buffered 2 percent Lignocaine Vs Buffered 4 percent articaine in Mandibular Flap Surgery A Double Blind Split Mouth Trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/094809
Enrollment
16
Registered
2025-09-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Buffered Lignocaine: The assigned anaesthetic buffered lignocaine was administered via inferior alveolar nerve block by syringe in a span of 30 seconds. Preparation of the Sodium Bicarb

Sponsors

Gangolu Meghana
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Patients requiring bilateral mandibular periodontal surgery 2 Age between 30- 60 years. 3 No allergy to local anesthetics or sodium bicarbonate. 4 Willingness to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or lactating women Patients with systemic conditions affecting wound healing (e.g., diabetes) History of hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or epinephrine Active infection at the surgical site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Onset Time 2.Duration of Anesthesia 3.VAS Pain Score Timepoint: 1.Time from injection to onset of numbness (in seconds) 2.Time from onset to return of normal sensation (in how many seconds) 3.45 minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Reinjection Needed 2 Any Adverse Effects Timepoint: 1. within 45 minutes 2. after 1 day—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vintha jaswitha

sibar institute of dental sciences

drmeghanagperio@sids.ac.in8143458843

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026