Comparing performance of Laryngeal mask airways blockbuster and baska for patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia

Comparison of performance characteristics of blockbuster and baska mask lma in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/09/094549

Enrollment

108

Registered

2025-09-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Blockbuster LMA: Comparing Performance characteristics The Blockbuster LMA is a second-generation supraglottic airway device designed for effective airway management during general anes

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 & 2 Mallampati 1 & 2 Elective Surgery of less than or equal to 2 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI more than 30 KG per M2 Mouth opening of less than 2 History of Gastroesophagial reflux disease Known allergies to an aesthetic agents or devices

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare time taken for successful insertion between blockbuster and baska LMA in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesiaTimepoint: At baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare number of insertion attempts To compare requirement for manipulation To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure To compare successful gastric tube placement To compare incidence of postoperative sore throat To compare adequacy of placement using glottic exposure grading To compare hemodynamic response during insertion & removal of device Timepoint: Compare incidence of postoperative sore throat at baseline 2hours,4hours & 6hours. Adequacy of placement using glottic exposure grading at baseline Hemodynamic response during insertion & removal of device at baseline.	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare number of insertion attempts To compare requirement for manipulation To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure To compare successful gastric tube placement To compare incidence of postoperative sore throat To compare adequacy of placement using glottic exposure grading To compare hemodynamic response during insertion & removal of device Timepoint: Compare incidence of postoperative sore throat at baseline 2hours,4hours & 6hours. Adequacy of placement using glottic exposure grading at baseline Hemodynamic response during insertion & removal of device at baseline.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMalvika Kishore

ESIC model hospital, Basaidarapur

nagpalvijaykumar@gmail.com9968304240

Outcome results