FindTrial
Sign In

RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL TO COMPARE WOUND DEHISCENCE RATES BETWEEN USE OF CYANOACRYLATE TISSUE GLUES ALONG WITH SUBCUTICULAR SKIN CLOSURE AND WITHOUT TISSUE GLUE IN SUBCUTICULAR SKIN CLOSURE.

Single Blinded Randomized Control Trial To Compare Wound Dehiscence Rates And Surgical Outcomes With And Without Cyanoacrylate Tissue Glues In Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Patients. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/09/094541
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-09-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-D49- Neoplasms

Interventions

Intervention1: SUBCUTICULAR MONOCRYL SUTURE WITH CYANOACRYLATE TISSUE GLUE: SUBCUTICULAR SKIN CLOSURE DONE WITH MONOCRYL SUTURE AFTER WHICH CYANOACRYLATE IS APPLIED ON WOUND EDGES, COVERING 5-10MM ON

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All Patients undergoing OPBS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known allergies to tissue glues - History of keloid formation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
WOUND DEHISCENCE RATES BETWEEN TWO GROUPSTimepoint: 4 WEEKS AND 12 WEEKS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
DIFFERENCE IN WOUND INFECTION RATES BETWEEN TWO GROUPS 2)WOUND INFECTION 3)TIME TO START ADJUVANT TREATMENT 4) COSMETIC ANALYSIS 4)OVERALL COMPLICATIONS RATES.Timepoint: 4 WEEKS AND 12 WEEKS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr ISHITA LAROIYA

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

Ishita_laroiya@yahoo.com8847496867

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026