Skip to content

A study comparing two materials for gum and bone healing in patients with dental implants.

Comparative Evaluation Of Soft and Hard Tissue Parameters in Immediate Implant Placement using Porcine-Derived Collagen Matrix with Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Vs Enamel Matrix Derivative with Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: A 6-Months Clinico Radiological Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/093894
Enrollment
22
Registered
2025-08-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Porcine-derived collagen matrix with DFDBA: Immediate implant placement in extraction sockets using porcine-derived collagen matrix mixed with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft

Sponsors

Grant application under review (Indian society of periodontology)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects aged between 22 to 70 years, including both male and female participants. Patients having at least one tooth scheduled for extraction due to advanced periodontal destruction, extensive carious lesions, root fracture, or failing endodontic treatment. Patients with no relevant medical history. Patients maintaining good oral hygiene with a plaque index score less than or equal to 1 as per Silness and Loe, 1964. Radiographic evidence of adequate buccal and lingual bone measuring at least 1 millimeter. Patients who are willing and able to comply with the treatment protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or lactating women. Radiographic evidence of inadequate buccal bone measuring less than 1 millimeter. Medically compromised patients or those taking immunosuppressive drugs that may complicate the treatment outcome. Patients with systemic diseases that can influence the outcome of treatment. Patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy. Patients with special needs or those who are physically challenged. Patients who use smokeless tobacco or are active smokers. Patients who fail to provide signed informed consent. Patients with a history of allergy to any of the materials used in the study. Patients who are unable or unwilling to maintain proper oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in gingival thickness, keratinized mucosa width, and crestal bone level between Group A (Porcine-derived collagen matrix with DFDBA) and Group B (Enamel matrix derivative with DFDBA) during immediate implant placement.Timepoint: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient-reported healing and acceptance, ease of handling of biomaterials by operator, and evaluation of long term soft tissue stability.Timepoint: Baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 16 weeks and 6 months.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pulkit Kaur Basra

Inderprastha Dental College and Hospital

basra.ppulkit@gmail.com8920847805

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026