FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing two different types of laryngoscopic blades in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Laryngoscopic glottic view with miller vs macintosh blade in adults posted for surgery under general anaesthesia:a randomized controlled trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/093715
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-08-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z409- Encounter for prophylactic surgery, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: LARYNGOSCOPIC BLADES: 50 patients will be intubated using mailler blade,and rest 50 patients will be intubated uisng macintosh blade. Control Intervention1: LARYNGOSCOPIC BLADES: To com

Sponsors

Sai Preetham reddy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Age 18-60 years 2)American society of Anaesthesiology(ASA)physical status 1&2. 3)Willing patients posted for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients with anticipated difficult airway(Mallampati grade 3&4,inadequate neck extension,mouth opening less than 3 fingers). 2)Patients requiring rapid sequence induction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To study the cormack-lehane grading obtained through miller and macintosh blades.Timepoint: During the time of intubation.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the ease of intubation,number of attempts,time required for intubation,manipulation requirement,bougie requirement.Timepoint: During the time of intubation.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR LINGARAJ SAHU

KALINGA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.

lingaraj.sahu@kims.ac.in8280166501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026