Skip to content

Comparative analysis of Crestal Bone Loss Between Flapless technique, Flap technique and flap with Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) after Implant Placement in edentolus area. participants will be edentulous area. interventions will be impplant placed with and with out mucoperiosteal

To Evaluate the comparative Crestal Bone Loss between flap, flap withPRF and lapless techniquefor implant placement - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/093191
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-08-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K063- Horizontal alveolar bone loss

Interventions

Intervention1: dental implant placed by flapless method: 6 months: dental implant placed in edentulous area placed by flapless method: 6 months Control Intervention1: dental implant placed with flap

Sponsors

anjali kapoor sel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: sufficient bone height and width sufficient width of keratinized tissue

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: systemic disease smokers pregnant and lactating females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to assess crestal bone loss radiographicallyTimepoint: to assess crestal bone loss radiographically assesed at baseline , 3 months and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDebopriya Chatterjee

RUHS-college of dental sciences

banerjee.debo@gmail.com07568677717

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026