Skip to content

To study the influence of crown design on the gingival health surrounding dental implants

A Comparative Evaluation of the Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique (BOPT) and Conventional Prosthetic Techniques in Single Implant-Supported Provisional Restorations: An In Vivo Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/093173
Enrollment
13
Registered
2025-08-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Provisional prosthesis design: Biologically oriented preparation technique provisional prosthesis on one implant and Conventional provisional prosthesis on the other second implant Cont

Sponsors

Dr Rashmit Minocha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Good oral hygiene. Patients requiring at least two single tooth replacements with implant supported fixed restoration. Mesio-distal width of 8 mm or less. Presence of adjacent teeth and antagonist teeth in alignment with absence of tilting / supra eruption .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA Classification Class 4 patients: Heart disease with marked signs of cardiac insufficiency. Recent myocardial infarction of less than 6 months duration. Unstable angina. Patients with advanced degrees of pulmonary, renal or endocrine insufficiency. Severe cardiac valvular dysfunction Sepsis Disseminated intravascular coagulation According to ASA Classification class 3 patients: Uncontrolled diabetes with complications to vascular or other organs i.e. retinopathy, neuropathy etc. Active hepatitis Implanted pacemaker 1. Immunocompromised patients 2. Blood dyscrasias 3. Occlusal anomalies Deep Bite Cross Bite 4. Para-functional habits Bruxism 5. Radiation therapy in orofacial region 6. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day) 7. Alcohol abusers 8. Recent history of any acute illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To evaluate impact of digitally fabricated provisional restorations, using the BOPT, on peri-implant soft tissue health and stability. 2.To evaluate the impact of conventionally fabricated provisional restorations on peri-implant soft tissue health and stability. 3.To compare the esthetic and clinical outcomes of peri-implant soft tissues between provisional restorations fabricated digitally using the BOPT and those fabricated using conventional technique. Timepoint: baseline, 1 month, 4 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Reshu Sanan

SGT UNIVERSITY

reshu.sanan@sgtuniversity.org9910063626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026