Skip to content

Comparing Implant Stability and Bone Health in Immediate vs Delayed Implants Using Two Drilling Methods in the Front?Upper?Jaw

Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability and Bone Assessment in Delayed and Immediate Implant Using Conventional and Osseodensification Drilling in Maxillary Esthetic Zone: Randomised?Control?Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/093152
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-08-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional Drilling with Osseodensification drilling in implants: After obtaining informed consent, participants will be seated comfortably in a dental chair under aseptic precautions
Group 2 ? delayed implant placement using the osseodensification drilling technique
Group 3 ? immediate implant placement using the conventional drilling technique
and Group 4 ? immediate implant placement using the osseodensification drilling technique. Osteotomy will be performed according to the assigned drilling protocol. Implants of the same system and dime

Sponsors

Dr Komal Ware
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Systemically healthy patients requiring and opting Dental Implants in maxillary Esthetic Zone 2)Sites will be Maxillary Esthetic Zone 4)Good oral hygiene and periodontal status 5)Adequate amount of bone volume at implant site allowing to perform the surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with systemic diseases that contraindicates the surgery, immune compromised patients. 2) Pregnant or lactating females. 3) H/o radiotherapy, smokers, parafunctional habits, acute and chronic infection. 4) Patients not willing to participate in the study or During the Study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Primary Implant Stability 2.secondary Implant Stability 3.Crestal bone level 4.Bone Density Timepoint: Baseline,3rd Month,6th Month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical soft tissue outcomes BOP ? Muhlemann?s Papillary Bleeding Index PPD- by UNC ? 15 probe Patient satisfaction index Timepoint: Baseline,3rd Month,6th Month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrKomal Ware

Government Dental College and Hospital Nagpur

drmbphadnaik@gmail.com9422254404

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026