Skip to content

study on the effect of correcting bite problems on neck posture and neck muscle activity

Comparison of cervical spine curvature, neck muscle activity and posture in individuals with normal occlusion versus those with sagittal malocclusions pre and post orthodontic assessment - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/093012
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-08-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Silverline Dent ad Care Solutions
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Individuals with Class II or Class III sagittal malocclusion (ANB angle more than 4 degrees for Class II, less than 0 degree for Class III) requiring orthodontic correction (study group). Individuals with normal Class I occlusion, well aligned arches, no prior orthodontic treatment (control group). Good general health without systemic illnesses. Willing to provide informed consent and comply with radiographic, EMG, and posture evaluations pre- and post-treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of temporomandibular joint disorders, craniofacial anomalies, or cleft lip/palate. Neuromuscular disorders, cervical spine pathology, or postural deformities unrelated to occlusion. Prior orthodontic or prosthodontic treatment affecting occlusion. Chronic neck pain or recent cervical injury. Pregnant or lactating females.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in cervical spine curvature measured on lateral cephalometric radiograph Change in neck muscle activity measured photogrammetrically Change in head and neck posture measured using surface electromyography (EMG)Timepoint: baseline ( before orthodontic treatment) at 6 months after initiation of treatment at completion of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between type/severity of malocclusion (Class II or III) and cervical posture parameters Improvement in forward head posture (craniovertebral angle) post-orthodontic treatment relative to controls Relationship between EMG changes and radiographic posture changesTimepoint: Same as primary: baseline and post-treatment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sagar Abichandani

silverline dent and care solutios pvt ltd

sagar.abichandani@gmail.com9819700729

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026