Skip to content

comparison of two local anesthesia immediately after injection

Efficacy and safety of plain 2 percent lignocaine versus 3 percent mepivacaine in pediatric dental procedures: A randomized controlled clinical trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/092881
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-08-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K049- Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues

Interventions

Intervention1: Mepivacaine: 3% Mepivacaine hydrochloride without vasoconstrictor dental local anesthestic Control Intervention1: Lignocaine: 2% lignocaine hydrochloride without vasoconstrictor dental

Sponsors

Dr. S Vittal sai
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children aged between 6-14years, Children with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I status, Children who require multiple appointments for treatment under local anesthesia as infiltration/block bilaterally.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children who are allergic to local anesthetic solution, Children with local infection, abscess and pus discharge, Children who are medically compromised and special children, Children who are not willing and whose parents declined to sign informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
3% mepivacaine may show less pain, fast onset and with less duration when compared to lignocaineTimepoint: 3% mepivacaine may show less pain, fast onset and with less duration when compared to lignocaine

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shrutha SP

AMEs dental college hospital and research center

shruthavinit@gmail.com9483329406

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026