To compare the effect of kinesio taping and Mc-connell taping on knee hyperextension and gait parameters in individuals with stroke using kinovea software and wisconsin gait scale.

Comparing the efficacy of kinesio and Mc-connell taping on knee hyperextension and gait parameters in individuals with stroke. - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/08/092816

Enrollment

Registered

2025-08-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G931- Anoxic brain damage, not elsewhereclassified

Interventions

Intervention1: kinesiotaping along with the routine physiotherapy with prowling. : This study involves post-stroke subjects with knee hyperextension. Eligible participants will be screened based on in

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: BOTH GENDER INCLUDED. FIRST EPISODE STROKE. SUBJECT REFERRED BY NEUROLOGIST WITH PRESENCE OF KNEE HYPEREXTENDED IN POST STROKE. MONTREALCOGNITIVE ASSESSMENT GREATER THAN 26. ABILITY TO WALK WITH OR WITHOUT SUPPORT INCLUDING ASSISTIVE DEVICES. BRUNNSTROM RECOVERY STAGE OF LOWERLIMB EQUAL TO GREATER THAN STAGE 3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: SEVERE MUSCLE CONTRACTURE. MSK OR CARDIOPULMONARY OR ANY OTHER. NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS OTHER THAN STROKE THAT INFLUENCE PERFORMANCE. ALLERY TO TAPING. UNCOOPERATIVE PATIENTS.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Bi-dimensional tool kinovea software-dorsiflexion angle and knee hyperextension angleTimepoint: 1 month	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
nilTimepoint: nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPrachi Bhanushali

shilpa.khandare@dpu.edu.in08149853651

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026