Effectiveness Of Intensive Interventions In Children With Cerebral Palsy

Effectiveness of Combined Intensive Interventional Approach In Improving Motor Functions In Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Prospective 3 Arm Parallel Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial - Not applicable

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/08/092589

Enrollment

Registered

2025-08-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G809- Cerebral palsy, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Intervention 1 for Group A: Upper extremity and trunk: CIMT: Constraint induced moment therapy for Upper extremity of lasts for an average of 30 minutes HABIT: Hand and Bimanual intensi

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children of age 4-10 years of either gender 2. Children with cerebral palsy confirmed by medical practitioner or paediatric neurologist 3. Children with GMFCS levels II-III with minimum 25-30 percentage of impairment in the outcomes like GMFM 66, QUEST, PDFM raw scores 4. Children with score of greater than 24 on Mini-Mental State Examination for Children (MMC) to understand and follow the commands of therapist. 5. Children and parents who gave consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with genetic disorders (Downs syndrome) and other diagnoses than CP 2. Children with severe complications like uncontrolled seizures 3. Children who underwent botulinum toxin, surgeries in the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), 2. Fine motor dimension of Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (PDMS-2)(PDFM), 3. ABILHAND, 4. Computer games-assisted Upper Extremity (CUE) assessment tool, 5. Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), 6. Temporal variables of gait step length, stride length and velocity, 7. Selective Control Assessment Of Lower Extremity (SCALE), 8. Physiological Cost Index, 9. Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), 10. Child engagement in daily life measure version 2, 11. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Cerebral Palsy Module (PedsQL 4.0 Cerebral Palsy Module).Timepoint: At baseline, 4th week and 8th week (0,4 & 8)	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), 2. Fine motor dimension of Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (PDMS-2)(PDFM), 3. ABILHAND, 4. Computer games-assisted Upper Extremity (CUE) assessment tool, 5. Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS), 6. Temporal variables of gait step length, stride length and velocity, 7. Selective Control Assessment Of Lower Extremity (SCALE), 8. Physiological Cost Index, 9. Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), 10. Child engagement in daily life measure version 2, 11. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Cerebral Palsy Module (PedsQL 4.0 Cerebral Palsy Module).Timepoint: At baseline, 4th week and 8th week (0,4 & 8)

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSanjay Parmar

SDM College of Physiotherapy

ranavari03@gmail.com7981794991

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026