Skip to content

A study comparing normal tissue doses and toxicity profile in two different techniques for Craniospinal irradiation

Prospective Comparative study of Dosimetry and Hematological profile in Craniospinal Irradiation with Full versus Partial arc technique - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/092483
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-08-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C716- Malignant neoplasm of cerebellum

Interventions

Intervention1: Craniospinal irradiation by partial arc technique: One group will receive radiotherapy of craniospinal axis by partial arc therapy Control Intervention1: Craniospinal irradiation by ful

Sponsors

Department of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Biopsy proven Medulloblastoma patients. Age more than 3 years. Those who are willing to give written informed consent. KPS/Lansky more than equal to 70 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Those with widespread disease and not suitable for definitive intent treatment 2. Those who have received prior chemotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare organs at risk doses includng low dose spillage volume of individual radiotherapy plans.Timepoint: At baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hematological toxicity during and after radiotherapy treatment.Timepoint: During radiotherapy and 1 month after completion of treatment.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Renu Madan

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh

renumadan10@yahoo.com9868597027

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026