Skip to content

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crown Restoration Using Three Diffrent techniques for managing carious primary molars.

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Stainless Steel Crown Restoration Using Conventional Technique, Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique for Managing Carious Primary Molars An In Vivo Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/08/092251
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-08-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional Technique: CASE SELECTION AND CARIES REMOVAL After selection of the case according to the inclusion criteria complete caries removal will be done with round bur (BR-45) fol

Sponsors

Dr AKSHAYDEEP K A
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Teeth with large occlusal caries 2.Teeth with occlusal caries involving marginal ridge 3.Teeth with multi surface caries without any clinical signs and symptoms of pulpal involvement. 4.Patients with high caries susceptibility. 5.Teeth with repeated restoration failure 6.Presence of at least two-third root structure radiographically. 7.Good general health 8.High risk of caries incidence 9.Children with behavior scale of 1 and 2 (Frankelââ?¬•s rating scale)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Teeth with signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or dental abscess 2.Teeth with clinical or radiographic signs of pulpal exposure or peri-radicular pathology 3.Crowns severely destructed with caries, which considered non-restorable 4.Fistula or /and mobility in the tooth 5.Doubtful presence of an intact dentin layer between the lesion and pulp 6.Teeth showing sign and symptoms of pathological internal and external resorption 7.Medically compromised patient 8.Very young children who do not understand the procedure or tolerate biting the crown into its position without local anesthesia 9.Children with behavior scale of 3 and 4 (Frankelââ?¬•s rating scale)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Best technique of crown placement will be evaluated on the basis of retention, gingival health and plaque accumulationTimepoint: At baseline, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Parental satisfaction will also be notted.Timepoint: At baseline, 3 months & 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr AKSHAYDEEP K A

Guru Nanak Dev Dental College and Research Institute

virinderg@gmail.com7012255114

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026