Diode laser-assisted non-surgical debridement versus open flap debridement alone.

Comparative evaluation of diode laser-assisted non-surgical debridement versus open flap debridement alone. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/08/092174

Enrollment

Registered

2025-08-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: LASER ASSISTED NONSURGICAL DEBRIDEMENT: FONA LASER power- 0.5 W, wavelength- 940nm, energy-2.5 J, frequency- 20 Hz, 320 micrometer laser tip (7mm length), duration- 60 seconds Control

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) residual probing depth 5-8 mm. 2) good level of oral hygiene after initial therapy. 3)no discrimination of gender,caste,religion or socio-economic status.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) medically compromised patients. 2)mentally disabled and physically handicapped patients. 3) smokers. 4) pregnant women and lactating mothers. 5) use of antibiotics in the previous 6 months. 6) uncooperative and poor oral hygiene patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
reduction of probing pocket depthTimepoint: before intervention, after 3 months and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
plaque index,gingival index,modified sulcular bleeding index,clinical attachment level and gingival recessionTimepoint: before intervention, after 3 months and 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swati Agarwal

Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad.

swatimds86@gmail.com8192917937

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026