FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison Of Video Laryngoscope And Conventional Laryngoscope For Endotracheal Intubation In Adults

COMPARISON OF VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND CONVENTIONAL LARYNGOSCOPE FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN ADULTS WITH CERVICAL SPINE IMMOBILISATION - Comparison Of Video Laryngoscope And Conventional Laryngoscope

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/092091
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-07-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparison Of Video Laryngoscope And Conventional Laryngoscope For Endotracheal Intubation In Adults With Cervical Spine Immobilisation: Adult Patients Aged 18 To 60 Years. Patients Cla

Sponsors

Dr Mahesh MJ
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years. Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I and II. Patients scheduled for elective endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known severe airway deformity, restricted mouth opening, upper airway tumours, or anticipated difficult airway (Mallampati Class III & IV). Patients who are on beta blockers or calcium channel blockers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the first-attempt success rate in seconds for endotracheal intubation between conventional laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Timepoint: Evaluate the first-attempt success rate in seconds for endotracheal intubation between conventional laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilization.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Determine the number of intubation attempts. Measure the time taken for successful intubation. Hemodynamic changes following laryngoscopy at 1, 3, & 5 minutes. Requirement of Backward Upward Rightward Pressure (BURP) manoeuvre. Record the use of adjuncts such as stylet or bougie during intubation. Incidence of failed intubation & oesophageal intubation. Timepoint: Determine the number of intubation attempts. Measure the time taken for successful intubation. Hemodynamic changes following laryngoscopy at 1, 3, & 5 minutes. Requirement of Backward Upward Rightward Pressure (BURP) manoeuvre. Record the use of adjuncts such as stylet or bougie during intubation. Incidence of failed intubation & oesophageal intubation.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGp Capt Dr Avanish Bhardwaj

Command Hospital (Air Force), Bengaluru

avanishbhardwaj78@gmail.com9914734466

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026