Vaginal misoprostol vs Dinoprostone gel: which is better for induction of labour among females with first delivery.

Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Fetomaternal Outcome following Induction of Labour With Vaginal Misoprostol v/s Dinoprostone Gel in Primigravida: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/091976

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery

Interventions

Intervention1: Tab Misoprostol: 25 mcg, 2 dose 12 hours apart Control Intervention1: Dinoprostone gel: 0.5mg, 2 dose 12 hours apart

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: primigravida, term pregnancy, live fetus, bishop score less than equal to 5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: multifetal pregnancy, malpresentation, abnormal fetal heart rate pattern, CPD, previous uterine surgery, placenta previa

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
induction to delivey interval, change in Bishop scoreTimepoint: Hourly till delivery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
requirement of oxycotcin augmentationTimepoint: 6 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrROHITASH KUMAR JAT

DR SN MEDICAL COLLEGE

rohit26.rc29@gmail.com9414285202

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026