Skip to content

Comparing two different drugs for insertion of airway device.

Randomized Double Blind Study To Evaluate The Comparison Of Ease Of Insertion Of Laryngeal Mask Airway In Children With Ketamine - Propofol And Fentanyl Propofol. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091898
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-07-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: - Health Condition 3: 4- Measurement and Monitoring

Interventions

Intervention1: GROUP PK PROPOFOL KETAMINE GROUP: we will give injection propofol and ketamine to the 40 patients in this group and will be looked for LMA insertion ease and hemodynamic stability.we wi

Sponsors

Dr Kamal jyoti kashyap
Lead Sponsor
DR ANU SHARMA
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 ASA grade 1 & 2 2 age 3 to 12 yrs 3 elective surgery of duration less than one hour

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 ASA 3 &4 2 patients at risk of aspiration 3 patient with airway abnormalities, anticipated difficult airway, pharyngeal pathology like abscesses, hematoma , tissue disruption 4 patient suffering from upper airway tract infection, reactive airway disease, asthmatic 5 seizure disorder , neuromuscular diseases 6 known egg allergy 7 patients giving refusal to participate in study 8 patients allergic to study drug 9 more than 3 failed attempts of LMA insertion in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1 TO compare and evaluate the ease of insertion for laryngeal mask airway with injection ketamine propofol and fentanyl propofol 2 Number of attempts of LMA insertion. 3 to compare the effect on hemodynamic parameters within the two groupsTimepoint: LMA insertion ease NOTED AT TIME OF insertion of LMA hEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS will be observed at baseline, pre induction, pre LMA, 1 minute , 3minute and 5 minutes post LMA insertion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 to compare incidence of pharyngo laryngeal morbidity like cough vomiting laryngospasm blood stain on LMA during removal 2 to compare the incidence of dysphagia sorethroat hoarsness of voice during recovery in post operative periodTimepoint: During the removal of LMA & during the post operative period

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR KAMAL JYOTI KASHYAP

Government medical college amritsar

gauryanheerak@yahoo.co.in9878883727

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026