Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: - Health Condition 3: 4- Measurement and Monitoring
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1 ASA grade 1 & 2 2 age 3 to 12 yrs 3 elective surgery of duration less than one hour
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1 ASA 3 &4 2 patients at risk of aspiration 3 patient with airway abnormalities, anticipated difficult airway, pharyngeal pathology like abscesses, hematoma , tissue disruption 4 patient suffering from upper airway tract infection, reactive airway disease, asthmatic 5 seizure disorder , neuromuscular diseases 6 known egg allergy 7 patients giving refusal to participate in study 8 patients allergic to study drug 9 more than 3 failed attempts of LMA insertion in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1 TO compare and evaluate the ease of insertion for laryngeal mask airway with injection ketamine propofol and fentanyl propofol 2 Number of attempts of LMA insertion. 3 to compare the effect on hemodynamic parameters within the two groupsTimepoint: LMA insertion ease NOTED AT TIME OF insertion of LMA hEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS will be observed at baseline, pre induction, pre LMA, 1 minute , 3minute and 5 minutes post LMA insertion | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1 to compare incidence of pharyngo laryngeal morbidity like cough vomiting laryngospasm blood stain on LMA during removal 2 to compare the incidence of dysphagia sorethroat hoarsness of voice during recovery in post operative periodTimepoint: During the removal of LMA & during the post operative period | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Government medical college amritsar