Skip to content

COMPARISION OF TWO SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICES IN SECURING AIRWAY IN ADULT PATIENTS

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION BETWEEN I-GEL AND PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CLINICAL STUDY - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091781
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-07-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K929- Disease of digestive system, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: To assess the oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.: ANAESTHETIC PROCEDURE: In the operating room, standard monitoring including ECG, pulse oximetry, n

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade: I and II Weight: 30 to 70 kg MP Grade: I to IV

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of devices. Mouth opening less than 2.5 cm. Expected during of surgery longer than 2 hours. Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia). Bleeding disorders. Lack of consent to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal Leak PressureTimepoint: Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure at the time of insertion and after 10 min of insertion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time of insertion of the study deviceTimepoint: Time taken to insert the study device after induction;Number of attempts for placement of study device (1/2/F)Timepoint: Time taken to insert the study device after induction;Laryngeal view score/grade using POGO scoreTimepoint: POGO score (0%, 33%, 100%);Ease of insertion of study deviceTimepoint: Number of adjustment manoeuvers (1, 2, 3);Changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure following insertion and removal of device.Timepoint: ;ComplicationsTimepoint: Trauma of lip, tougue, pharynx Blood staining in devices Sore Throat, Hoarseness of voice

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR SYED HUSSAIN AMIR

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU MEDICAL COLLEGE, ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH

hussainamir77@gmail.com9897559183

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026