FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluation Of the Effect of Laser Alone and Laser and Vibration on Orthodontic Tooth Movement By a Split Mouth Study

Efficacy Of High Frequency Vibration With Low Intensity Laser Therapy Versus High Frequency Vibration To Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement A Split Mouth Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091733
Enrollment
28
Registered
2025-07-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Low Level Laser And High Frequency Vibration: On One Side Of Mouth Laser Was Applied On Canine And on Both Sides Vibration Was Applied To The Canine. We Will Be Comparing The Effect Of

Sponsors

Amal B J
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of either sex with age group of 18-25 years. Angle s class I or class II Division 1 malocclusion with Bimaxillary protrusion Extraction of maxillary 1st premolar as a treatment plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with previous h/o orthodontic treatment Patient with canine having dilacerated roots Patients with impacted canine Patients with sign of gingival periodontal disease. Patients with metabolic disorders that leads to bone pathologies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
rate of canine retractionTimepoint: before beginning canine retraction,after 3 months of canine retraction ,after complete canine retraction—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
mmp9 level in gcfTimepoint: before begining of canine retraction,after 3 months of canine retraction ,after 6 months of canine retraction—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmal B J

Government Dental College and Hospital Mumbai

wasundharabhad@gmail.com9890227819

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026