FindTrial
Sign In

Partially absorbable versus non absorbable mesh used in laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair

A Prospective Comparative Study of Partially Absorbable Mesh vs Non- Absorbable Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091650
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K402- Bilateral inguinal hernia, withoutobstruction or gangrene Health Condition 2: K409- Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Fit for laparoscopic surgical repair under general anesthesia 2.Willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow- up schedule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Femoral hernia, complicated hernias, or those needing emergency repair 2.Recurrent inguinal hernia 3.Major comorbidities or immunocompromised states affecting surgical safety

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the postoperative pain, complications (seroma formation, urinary retention and mesh infection), foreign body sensation, hernia recurrence in both the groups. (partially absorbable mesh and non absorbable mesh ) Help in optimal mesh selectionTimepoint: Preoperative data collection Intraoperative data collection Postoperative POD1 1-2Weeks 3Months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGopika Sreeja Vijay

Kasturba Hospital, Manipal

sunilkrishna@manipal.edu9986516627

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026