Skip to content

Comparison of four different tooth colored material in non-carious cervical lesions-Randomized clinical trial

Clinical evaluation and comparison of four different types of tooth coloured restorative materials in non-carious class V lesions An In vivo study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091620
Enrollment
79
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K031- Abrasion of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Dr Pulkit Kalyan: Professor and Head Department pf Public Health Dentistry K M Shah Dental College Vadodara Gujrat Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Nil: Nil Intervention4: Nil: Ni

Sponsors

Dr Apeksha Surse
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The participants having fair oral hygiene and vital teeth in age group of 20-60 years old are included The participants having proper occlusal and interproximal contact are included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The participants with poor oral hygiene were excluded also participants having carious and discolored tooth are excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difference in the performance of the four different tooth colored materials namely GIC Giomer Flowable compomer High strength composite material was seen in the four aspect to be observed namely staining marginal discoloration surface roughness and retention till the 6 months follow up visitTimepoint: This was seen for 15 days 3 months and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Himanshu Srivastava

Professor and Head

himanshu.srivastava97@gmail.com8668573213

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026