Skip to content

A study comparing Cold and Vibration to reduce Pain during Injections for hair loss

Efficacy of cold vs vibratory analgesia for pain relief in Platelet-Rich Plasma therapy: a randomized split scalp study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091513
Enrollment
52
Registered
2025-07-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L649- Androgenic alopecia, unspecified Health Condition 2: L650- Telogen effluvium

Interventions

Intervention1: Kinetic Anaesthetic Device (vibratory analgesia): Kinetic Anaesthetic Device will be covered with a disposable, sterile plastic film and applied 2 cm from the scalp injection site befor

Sponsors

Dr Rudrani Mukherjee
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. People aged 18 years or more than 18 years undergoing scalp Platelet Rich Plasma therapy 2. Willingness to receive either cold therapy or vibratory analgesia as a pain management technique during PRP 3. Intact scalp sensation 4. Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study protocols, including pain assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Contraindications to cold therapy including previous history of Raynaud s disease or phenomenon, cold urticaria, cryoglobulinemia 2. Use of systemic or local analgesics, anesthetics, or sedatives within 24 hours before PRP injection 3. Neurological disorders affecting scalp sensation including scalp neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia 4. Active scalp infections 5. Pregnant or lactating patients 6. Cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorders, or communication barriers preventing accurate pain reporting

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between mean Pain Scores using the Visual Analogue Scale of Cold versus Vibratory analgesia during PRPTimepoint: 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment and comparison of mean Ease of Administration Scores using the Likert Scale for Cold versus Vibratory analgesia during PRPTimepoint: 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mihika Noronha

Kasturba Medical College Manipal

mihika.noronha@manipal.edu8105045938

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026