Skip to content

Comparing two bio-materials for socket preservation for delayed implant placement: A study on Platelet rich fibrin and Collagen Membrane.

Evaluation of efficacy of placing delayed dental implant following Ice-cream Cone Technique of socket preservation using Autologous Heat Compressed Platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF) membrane with Bone Allograft compared to Collagen Membrane with Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091461
Enrollment
51
Registered
2025-07-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Delayed Implant placement following socket preservation with Autologous Heat Compressed PRF membrane with DFDBA: Participants desiring dental implant treatment and satisfying the eligib

Sponsors

Government Dental College And Research institute Bangalore
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 ASA Physical status I & II 2 Type 2 extraction socket of non-molar tooth with at least 50 percent intact buccal bone plate and the remaining three walls are intact with adjacent teeth in good periodontal health.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Participants taking medication influences the bone metabolism and bone healing. 2 Participants with the habit of smoking. 3 Participants in which tooth is extracted due to periodontal breakdown. 4 Participants with acute infection (or presence of pus) in or close to the site intended for extraction. 5 Participants with occlusal disharmony. 6 Pregnant and Lactating mothers. 7 Participants with poor oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1 Dimensional changes (soft tissue and hard tissue) from baseline to 4 months post-operatively between 3 groups as assessed by intra-oral scanner and CBCT 2 Feasibility of placing an implant in a prosthetically driven position along with achieving the primary stability. Feasibility of implant placement is defined as achieving primary stability following implant placement in a prosthetically guided position with 1mm of residual bone circumferentially surrounding the implant . Timepoint: 1 at Baseline 2 4 months after performing the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Dimensional changes (soft tissue and hard tissue) from baseline to 4 months post-operatively between 3 groups as assessed by intra-oral scanner and CBCT Feasibility of placing an implant in a prosthetically driven position along with achieving the primary stability. Feasibility of implant placement is defined as achieving primary stability following implant placement in a prosthetically guided position with 1mm of residual bone circumferentially surrounding the implant . Timepoint: 4 months after socket preservation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr shreyas kamath

Government dental college and research institute

periosmitha@gmail.com9449630572

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026