FindTrial
Sign In

study to evaluate efficient composite restoration technique

Evaluation of bite force between conventional direct composite restoration technique and occlusal stamp technique- a comparative clinical study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091278
Enrollment
15
Registered
2025-07-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: composite resin restoration for carious lesions: conventional technique Control Intervention1: composite resin restoration: occlusal stamp technique

Sponsors

Dr Dhanya Joseph Madassery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children aged between 7years to 14 years. 2. Patients with bilateral class 1 cavity (ICDAS code 2 to 4) on permanent mandibular first molar.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with TMJ disorders, craniomandibular dysfunction 2. Patients with intellectual disability 3. Patients with acute pain or abscess 4. Patients with nonocclusion in the posterior region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The occlusal stamp technique is more accurate than the conventional techniqueTimepoint: at baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time required for finishing & polishing in both the techniquesTimepoint: at baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Madhusudhan KS

The Oxford Dental College

sudhannks@gmail.com9886035137

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026