Acceptance and preference of electronic anaesthetic device over conventional

Acceptance and preference of local anaesthesia technique with Conventional and Electronic anaesthetic device -A comparative study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/091240

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Starpen electronic anesthetic device: electronically controlled local anesthesia delivery method for 3 months Control Intervention1: conventional technique: syringe method of local anes

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Requiring minor paediatric dental procedures on both sides of the dental arch. Written consent from the parent No cognitive impairment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Special children with mental disabilities. Children suffering from systemic disorders. Unwilling and unaccompanied children.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Electronic dental anaesthetic device is better than conventional techniqueTimepoint: baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
conventional is better than electronic anesthetic deviceTimepoint: baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnnlitta Felix

The Oxford dental college

bharath.dentist@gmail.com9886588595

Outcome results