FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Two Ways to Insert a Breathing Device (LMA): Using a Bougie Tool vs the Regular Method A Randomized Comparative Study

Comparison of Bougie guided Insertion of Blockbuster LMA Versus Conventional method in successful placement of LMA A Randomised Comparative Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/091221
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-07-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 2- Placement

Interventions

Intervention1: Bougie guided placement of LMA: Railloading of LMA over bougie using laryngoscope inside the oral cavity of patient for maintaining airway during ot. Control Intervention1: Digital inse

Sponsors

Subbiah Institute of Medical Science
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status 1 and 2 Modified mallampatti 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical status 3 and 4 Modified mallampatti 3 and 4 Pregnant women Obesity with BMI greater than 30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of attempts for successful placement of LMA Timepoint: 3 attempts—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Duration for a successful placement of Blockbuster LMA 2) Hemodynamic response to insertion 3) Airway trauma during insertion 4) Presence of visible blood staining on laryngoscope blade, LMA & bougie. 5) Post-operative complications like sore throat,dysphagia & dysphonia.Timepoint: within 24 hrs—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Raveesh J R

Subbiah Institute of Medical Science

swethabadami84@gmail.com8151065298

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026