To compare the time taken for Internal Jugular Vein cannulation by two different techniques via posterior approach in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.

A Randomized Comparative Study Of IJV Cannulation By Anatomical Landmark Technique Versus USG Guided Technique Via Posterior Approach At S.M.S. Medical College , Jaipur. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/090896

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Group B= USG guided technique will be used for IJV cannulation via posterior approach.: The patient will be placed in Trendlenburg position, with head slightly rotated to the contralate

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients giving informed written consent. 2. Patients of either gender of age 18 years and above scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. 3. Subjects with ASA grade 2 to 3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients taking part in any other study. 2. Patients with prior neck surgery. 3. Patients with suspected cervical spine injury. 4. Patients with penetrative injury to neck or head and neck cancer patients. 5. Patients with coagulopathies. 6. Patients with BMI more than 30. 7. Patients with local site infections and burns.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To assess and compare the first attempt success rate of IJV cannulation between the two groups.Timepoint: First attempt sucess rate will be assessed at baseline for the two techniques.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.To assess & compare the difference in number of attempts taken for IJV cannulation between the two groups. 2.To assess & compare the overall success rate of IJV cannulation between the two groups. 3.To determine the difference in flash time, cannulation time & total procedure time. 4.To assess & compare the incidence of procedure related complications between the two groups.Timepoint: 1.Number of attempts taken at baseline. 2.Skin puncture to blood falshback time in seconds at baseline. 3.Blood flashback to catheter insertion time in seconds at baseline. 4.Total procedure time in seconds at baseline. 5.Complications if any, such as, hematoma formation, posterior wall puncture, carotid artery puncture will be noted at baseline.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.To assess & compare the difference in number of attempts taken for IJV cannulation between the two groups. 2.To assess & compare the overall success rate of IJV cannulation between the two groups. 3.To determine the difference in flash time, cannulation time & total procedure time. 4.To assess & compare the incidence of procedure related complications between the two groups.Timepoint: 1.Number of attempts taken at baseline. 2.Skin puncture to blood falshback time in seconds at baseline. 3.Blood flashback to catheter insertion time in seconds at baseline. 4.Total procedure time in seconds at baseline. 5.Complications if any, such as, hematoma formation, posterior wall puncture, carotid artery puncture will be noted at baseline.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swati Singh

Sawai Mansingh Medical College, Jaipur

reemadr.rn@gmail.com9413237117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026