FindTrial
Sign In

TO COMPARE LASER TREATMENTS WITH STANDARD TREATMENTS IN ADULTS FOR SENSITIVE TEETH AND CHECK WHICH ONE IS BETTER

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090839
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-07-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K031- Abrasion of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: High Power Diode Laser: After isolation, Irradiation of tooth surface with 980nm high power diode LASER (Biolase epicX)from a distance of 1mm for 30 seconds in continuous mode Intervent

Sponsors

Dr Bhavana Shikari
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who are 18 to 70 years old with complaints of DHS for more than 1 year Stimulated DHS more than 6 on the visual analogue scale DHS that affected 3 nonadjacent teeth of different mouth semiarches Patients with NCCL or Gingival recession (Miller Class I and II gingival recession)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who have undergone Periodontal surgery in the last 3 months Use of desensitizing paste or any desensitizing treatment in the last 3 months Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment Pregnant or breastfeeding women Teeth with caries pulpitis congenital anomalies fracture or occlusal interferences

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction in Dentin HypersensitivityTimepoint: 18 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Long term clinical efficacy of desentizing methodsTimepoint: 18 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhavana Shikari

Government Dental College and Hospital Jamnagar

lihiren@yahoo.com9879503545

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026