Skip to content

Dental implant healing in diabetes: comparing UV-treated and untreated implants

A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Soft Tissue Healing and Crestal Bone Levels Around Photo-Functionalized Versus Non-Functionalized Dental Implants in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090827
Enrollment
10
Registered
2025-07-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Photofunctionalized dental implants: UV-treated dental implants These implants are exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light before placement. The UV light makes the implant surface more acti

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Minimum of two teeth indicated for extraction on each side of the arch. Age between 30 to 59 year controlled diabetic status: HbA1c : 6.5 percent to 8.0 percent Fasting glucose : 90 to 130 mg per dl postprandial glucose : less than 180 mg per dl Nonsmokers Presence of functional opposing dentition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with uncontrolled systemic disease like hypertension. Patients presenting abuse of drugs or alcohol, use of tobacco. Patients presenting with handicap condition that would adversely affect the capacity to maintain satisfactory oral hygiene or complete the study protocol. Patient with immunocompromised conditions, including HIV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Soft Tissue Healing Clinical evaluation of soft tissue healing around photofunctionalized and non-photofunctionalized implants. Assessed on Day 0 (baseline), Day 3, Day 6, and Day 15 using standardized clinical parameters (e.g., redness, swelling, bleeding). Crestal Bone Level Changes Radiographic assessment of bone levels around the implants using Radiovisiography (RVG). Measurements taken at baseline (implant placement), 2 months, and 4 months postoperatively. Timepoint: Soft Tissue Healing Clinical evaluation of soft tissue healing- Day 0 (baseline), Day 3, Day 6, and Day 15 Crestal Bone Level Changes Radiographic assessment of bone levels - at baseline (implant placement), 2 months, and 4 months postoperatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between Test and Control Sites (Split-Mouth) Comparison of healing outcomes between the UV-treated (photofunctionalized) and non-treated implants within the same patient. Effectiveness of Photofunctionalization in Diabetic months (bone level). Patients Evaluation of whether UV-treated implants lead to improved healing in controlled Type II diabetic individuals compared to untreated implants. Timepoint: baseline, day 3, day 15 (soft tissue) baseline, 2 months , 4 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactANKITA RAMESH GOMARE

Santosh deemed to be university, Ghaziabad

akshay.bhargava@santosh.ac.in9999960255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026