FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of effectiveness of wing shaped implant component and a membrane in vertical and horizontal ridge defect restoration around dental implants

Comparison of clinical effect of winged abutment and guided bone regeneration membrane for vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation around dental implants a randomized controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090767
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-07-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: ridge augmentation for vertical and horizontal bone defects.: In case of a ridge defect, it is challenging to place an implant
to overcome this, ridge augmentation is the treatment of choice for better implant stability by different membranes. Duration- 2 years Control Intervention1: Winged and Guided bone regeneration membra

Sponsors

E Sangeetha
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Siebert s Class III Both vertical and horizontal bone loss. 2. An indication for a fixed implant-retained prosthesis. 3. Insufficient bone height for insertion of dental implants. 4. Absence of previously treated periodontal disease. 5. Ability to understand and accept the requirements of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Medical conditions that compromised tissue healing (osteoporosis, haemophilia, anaemia, etc.) 2.Treatment with an interfering medication (bisphosphonate or steroid therapy). 3.Radiation therapy within the last 2 years. 4.Pregnancy or lactating women. H/O smoking habit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To restore both horizontal and vertical bone around dental implants using a winged abutment abutment, with a follow-up of 6 months.Timepoint: follow up in 6 months.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate bone gain after reconstructive procedure using radiographic imaging (CBCT) and stability of implant using resonance frequency analysis follow up of 3 months and 6 months.Timepoint: To evaluate bone gain after reconstructive procedure using radiographic imaging (CBCT) and stability of implant using resonance frequency analysis follow up of 3 months and 6 months.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr E SANGEETHA

Karpaga Vinayaga Institute Of Dental Sciences

anizmds@gmail.com9884233240

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026