Skip to content

Comparison of two minimally invasive treatments for varicose veins: Foam injection vs small vein removal A randomized study

Comparison of foam sclerotherapy with ambulatory phlebectomy in patient of varicose veins tributaries A randomized controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090624
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-07-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I832- Varicose veins of lower extremities with both ulcer and inflammation

Interventions

Intervention1: Foam Sclerotherepy: Foamed intralesional sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS), follow up duration 3 months Control Intervention1: Ambulatory phlebectomy: After an incision, close to the vein

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research PGIMER Chandigarh India
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18-80 years Willing to give consent for participating in the RCT. Patient undergoing foam sclerotherapy with ambulatory phlebectomy for varicose veins of tributaries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence or history of deep vein thrombosis. Prior history of deep vein thrombosis Allergic to sclerosants Associated arterial and neuropathic problems Pregnant and lactating women Prior history of trauma Acute venous thrombosis or prior foam sclerotherapy-induced symptomatic superficial thrombophlebitis. Previous temporary neurological event related to foam sclerotherapy. Patients who refuse consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To find differences in disease-specific quality of life indicator at baseline and 3 months post-interventionTimepoint: 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical success measured in the form of reduction in pain using Visual analogue scale, degree of bruising and phlebitis and the time taken to return to work and normal activitiesTimepoint: 3 months;Complication rates- Wound infection, hematoma, nerve injury, thrombophlebitis, pigmentation scarring.Timepoint: 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ajay Savlania

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

drajaysavlania@gmail.com9988130747

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026