Skip to content

A study comparing AI-based and conventional digital smile design in adult dental patients receiving Veneers

Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of AI-driven Digital Smile Design vs Conventional Digital Wax-up: Measuring 3-Year Veneer Survival, Color Stability and Cost-Utility

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090594
Enrollment
76
Registered
2025-07-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: AI driven digital smile design: participants in this group underwent treatment planning using artificial intelligence based digital smile design software that utilised facial analysis,

Sponsors

Silverline Dent and Care Solutions Pvt Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: systemically healthy adults aged 18-55 years. requirements for 4-8 maxillary anterior veneers for aesthetic reasons. no prior restorations on anterior teeth in aesthetic zone. good periodontal health. singed informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: presence of parafunctional habits. smokers or tobacco users. history of trauma or root canal therapy in anterior teeth. pregnant or lactating mothers. poor oral hygiene or untreated periodontal disease. allergies to ceramic materials or bonding agents.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
3 year clinical survival of anterior ceramic veneers ( measured by absence of debonding, fracture or loss)Timepoint: 3 year clinical survival of anterior ceramic veneers ( measured by absence of debonding, fracture or loss)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
incremental cost utility ratio ( ICUR) per satisfaction point gainedTimepoint: at final review ( 36 months);colour stability of veneers ( measured with spectrophotometer )Timepoint: at final review ( 36 months);patient satisfaction score using VAS ( visual analogue scale)Timepoint: at final review ( 36 months);oral health impact profile ( OHIP-14 aesthetic sub scale improvement)Timepoint: pre treatment and 36 months post treatment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sagar Abichandani

Silverline Dent and Care Solutions Pvt. Ltd

sagar.abichandani@gmail.com9819700729

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026