FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THERMOFORMED AND DIRECTLY PRINTED ALIGNER MATERIALS

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THERMOFORMED AND DIRECTLY PRINTED ALIGNER MATERIALS: AN IN VIVO STUDY - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090569
Enrollment
16
Registered
2025-07-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: aligner: changes in mechanical properties of two different aligner materials at 0 day, 7 day and 14 day Control Intervention1: aligner: mechanical properties of aligner material PETG an

Sponsors

Divya Lohia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient with good oral hygiene 2.Patient with mild to moderate malocclusion. 3.Patient with good compliance to wear aligners 4.Patient should wear atleast 20-22 hours per day

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient with poor oral hygiene. 2.Patient with a habit of smoking, tobacco chewing or bruxism. 3.Any other food habit which could alter the aligner material properties. 4.Distorted aligners. •Patient with Esophageal reflux as it may affect the property of the material.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
mechanical properties of alignersTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to determine which material is best for aligner fabricationTimepoint: 8 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gurkeerat Singh

Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences and Research

drgurkeeratsingh@gmail.com9811063930

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026