Randomised clinical trial to evaluate incision related complication of abdominal wall closure in case of intestinal perforation by barbed vs non-barbed suture in north indian population .

Evaluation of incision related complication in emergent abdominal fascial closure with barbed vs non-barbed suture type in hollow viscous perforation: randomized clinical trial in north Indian population - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/090520

Enrollment

136

Registered

2025-07-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Absorbable Barbed Suture: Symmetrical Barbed PDS Suture Control Intervention1: Absorbable Suture: PDS Loop Suture

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for hollow viscous perforation with primary fascial closure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Age less than 18 years 2.Immunocompromised patient 3.Unstable patient undergoing damage control surgery 4.Patient having midline scar /incisional hernia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Rate of abdominal wall dehiscence/or burst abdomen in the patients undergoing emergent abdominal fascial closure in hollow viscous perforation. Timepoint: 30 days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
superficial SSI in 30 days fallow up period length of hospital stayTimepoint: 6 month follow up	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Amit Kumar Gupta

AIIMS Raebareli

amitonline44@gmail.com8433028881

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026