Skip to content

Comparing two different systems of bone removal in 3rd molar extractions surgery.

A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Piezo Surgical System Versus Conventional Drilling Techniques in Healing Outcomes Following Tooth Extraction in Patients with Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090395
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-07-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K010- Embedded teeth Health Condition 2: K01- Embedded and impacted teeth Health Condition 3: K02- Dental caries Health Condition 4: K04- Diseases of pulp and periapical tissues Health Condition 5: K05- Gingivitis and periodontal diseases Health Condition 6: K05- Gingivitis and periodontal diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: Piezoelectric surgical system: Extraction of mandibular third molar in which bone removal will be done with peizo surgical system which generates micro vibrations to cut the bone Contro

Sponsors

Dr Jyot Sarvaiya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed with oral sub mucous fibrosis Age between 25 to 60 years Mouth Opening between 15mm to 35mm Mandibular third molar teeth indicated for surgical extraction(Pederson score: Slightly difficult and moderately diffiicult[3-6] Patient willing to participate in the study and available for long term follow up Teeth cannot be saved endodontically

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with cardiac pacemakers Patients with systemic diseases(ASA-2, ASA-3, ASA-4) Age less than 25 years and greater than 60 years Patients with bleeding and clotting disorders Patients with a history of allergies or adverse effects to local aesthetic agents

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative pain Swelling Wound HealingTimepoint: 1st 3rd and 7th days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative Patient reported comfort Acceptability Duration of operative interventionTimepoint: Same day

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nishit Kumar

Government Dental College and Hospital

dr.rrandhawa23@gmail.com9065999990

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026