A comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal mask protector and baska in terms of their airway sealing pressures in neutral and lateral positions in patients under general anaesthesia.

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of laryngeal mask airway protector laryngeal mask airway proseal and baska in anaesthetised and paralysed patients in neutral and lateral positions a randomised double blinded control study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/090357

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring

Interventions

Intervention1: Insertion of laryngeal mask airway protector and baska: To compare the insertion characteristics and oropharyngeal leak pressure in neutral and lateral positions in anaesthetised and p

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient aged 18 to 70 years belonging to ASA 1physical status I and II undergoing elective surgery for 1 to 3 hours under general anaesthesia will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known difficult airway, edentulous, body mass index more than 30, upper airway pathology, mouth opening less than 3.2 cm, gastroesophageal reflux, increased risk of aspiration, recent upper respiratory tract infection, and lack of consent to participate will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
COMPARISON OF OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY PROTECTOR , LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY PROSEAL AND BASKA IN NEUTRAL AND LATERAL POSITIONSTimepoint: 0 minutes 3 minutes 6 minutes and 9 minutes after insertion	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the insertion characteristics of LMA protector ,LMA proseal and BASKA in terms of : Time taken for successful insertion Ease of insertion Number of attempts required for insertion Ease of NG tube placement Grading of fibre optic view of laryngeal structures Blood stain present on removal of device To look for any postoperative side effects like sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness of voice. Timepoint: Hemodynamic monitoring BP, HR, Spo2 at 0min, 3mins, 6min and 9 min after supraglottic airway device insertion.	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare the insertion characteristics of LMA protector ,LMA proseal and BASKA in terms of : Time taken for successful insertion Ease of insertion Number of attempts required for insertion Ease of NG tube placement Grading of fibre optic view of laryngeal structures Blood stain present on removal of device To look for any postoperative side effects like sore throat, dysphagia, hoarseness of voice. Timepoint: Hemodynamic monitoring BP, HR, Spo2 at 0min, 3mins, 6min and 9 min after supraglottic airway device insertion.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Arun Kumar

Chettinad hospital and research institute

pugalenthi08@yahoo.co.in9489404818

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026