Comparison of Super Inductive System Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy in Treating Upper Cross Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of Super Inductive System Therapy and Conventional Therapy in subjects with Upper Cross Syndrome - Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/090328

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M959- Acquired deformity of musculoskeletal system, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Super Inductive System plus Conventional therapy Group A: Frequency: 3 sessions per week Duration: 15 minutes per session Intensity: As per tolerance, starting at low intensity and gra

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 45 years diagnosed with Upper Cross Syndrome based on clinical assessment. Complaints of neck pain for at least three months. Pain Pressure Threshold more or equal 2.5 N per cm2 over UCS-affected muscles. Craniovertebral angle more or equal48 degrees indicating forward head posture. Neck Disability Index score less or equal 10 percent, indicating functional limitations. Willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History and recent diagnosis of cervical spine pathology such as herniated disc, cervical spondylosis, or spinal fractures. Neurological disorders affecting muscle function. Recent trauma, surgery, or injury to the neck, shoulder, or upper back within the last six months. Severe musculoskeletal conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis. Pregnant or lactating women. Implants or Pacemaker in the Upper quadrant of the body. Skin infections, open wounds, or dermatological conditions in the treatment area. Uncontrolled metabolic disorders. Presently on any other Alternative therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1)Pain 2)ROM 3)Craniovertebral angle 4)Strength.Timepoint: Day of intervention and post intervention 4th week	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1)Posture 2)Kyphotic angle 3)Shoulder angle 4)Functional mobility.Timepoint: On Day 1 of intervention and 4th week of intervention	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Santosh Metgud

K.L.E Institute of Physiotherapy

santoshmetgud@klekipt.edu.in9164646484

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026