Skip to content

Comparison Between Fusion Optimised Intervals (FOI) and Device Automated Algorithms For Reverse Remodelling in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CORRECT-CRT Trial).

Comparison Between Fusion Optimised Intervals (FOI) and Device Automated Algorithms For Reverse Remodelling in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CORRECT-CRT Trial). - CORRECT-CRT Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090156
Enrollment
388
Registered
2025-07-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I498- Other specified cardiac arrhythmias

Interventions

Intervention1: Fusion-optimised interval (FOI): Fusion-optimised interval (FOI) method of AV and VV delay optimization with Intrinsic electrogram based automated algorithms - two most simple and promi

Sponsors

ICMR NEW DELHI
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i. Age more than 18 years ii. Patient with HF iii. In sinus rhythm iv. With New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II to ambulatory IV despite optimal guideline directed medical treatment. For NYHA I left ventricular EF must be less than or equal to 30% v. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to 35% (for NYHA class II to ambulatory IV) vi. QRS width more than or equal to120 ms with left bundle branch block (LBBB) vii. Successful CRT implantation viii. Post implant RV-LV duration more than or equal to 70 milliseconds ix. Patient is giving consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. Patient with treatable cardiomyopathy ii. Subjects with documented permanent complete AV block or significant AV block (AV interval more than or equal to 250 milliseconds) iii. Patient with atrial fibrillation iv. Life expectancy shorter than 12 months due to any medical condition v. Patient having RBBB or nonspecific IVCD. vi. Subject is awaiting cardiac transplantation or is to receive a VAD. vii. Patient on hemodialysis i. Patient with treatable cardiomyopathy ii. Subjects with documented permanent complete AV block or significant AV block (AV interval more than or equal to 250 milliseconds) iii. Patient with atrial fibrillation iv. Life expectancy shorter than 12 months due to any medical condition v. Patient having RBBB or nonspecific IVCD. vi. Subject is awaiting cardiac transplantation or is to receive a VAD. vii. Patient on hemodialysis viii. Woman of childbearing potential who is planning to be pregnant during the course of the trial. ix. Not wiling to give written consent. x. Not capable of complying with follow up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We expect the fusion optimized intervals (FOI) strategy to cause Clinical and Anatomical Improvement i.e., composite of LV reverse remodeling and or improvement of 6MWTD at 12 months follow-up. Timepoint: 12 months follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We expect the fusion optimized intervals (FOI) strategy to cause Clinical and Anatomical Improvement i.e., improvement of 6MWTD at 12 months follow-up.Timepoint: 12 months follow-up.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Nitish Naik

AIIMS NEW DELHI

nitishnaik@yahoo.co.in8383064241

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026