A study to compare different types of implant connections based on its aesthetics, survival rate and gingival health

Comparison of the effect of different types of custom abutments on aesthetic and survival outcomes, and peri-implant tissue health - A randomised control trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/090131

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Group MPA: Implants with milled PEEK custom abutment. Group ZHA: Implants with Zr hybrid custom abutment. Group PHA: Implants with PEEK hybrid custom abutment. Group DMLS: Implants wi

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Participants of age 18 - 60 years regardless of the gender. 2.Patients with single or multiple missing teeth to be replaced by implant prosthesis. 3.Patients with good oral hygiene and without any uncontrolled periodontal disease. 4.Sufficient mesio-distal and apico-coronal space for implant prosthesis placement. 5.Patients having stable occlusion. 6.Systemically healthy participants without any history of periodontal disease and smoking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients developing systemic diseases during the study that would interfere with dental implant therapy. 2.Patients who are pregnant or becoming pregnant during the course of the study. 3.Patients failing to obtain osseointegration after implant placement.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.Gingival health: which include peri implant pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) 2.Marginal bone level 3.Pink esthetic score (PES) 4.Survival rate of prosthesis Timepoint: 1.Gingival health: which include peri implant pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) at 1 week after final prosthesis insertion, 3 months and 6 months. 2.Marginal bone level: Immediately after final prosthesis insertion, 3 months and 6 months. 3.Pink esthetic score (PES): during the final prosthesis delivery and at 3 months and 6 months. 4.Survival rate of prosthesis: After 3 months and 6 months.	—

Measure

Time frame

1.Gingival health: which include peri implant pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) 2.Marginal bone level 3.Pink esthetic score (PES) 4.Survival rate of prosthesis Timepoint: 1.Gingival health: which include peri implant pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PI) at 1 week after final prosthesis insertion, 3 months and 6 months. 2.Marginal bone level: Immediately after final prosthesis insertion, 3 months and 6 months. 3.Pink esthetic score (PES): during the final prosthesis delivery and at 3 months and 6 months. 4.Survival rate of prosthesis: After 3 months and 6 months.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKrishnaprasad A

Government Dental College, Kozhikode

pramodav@hotmail.com9447169055

Outcome results