Skip to content

Comparison of Tunnelling With Platelet Rich Fibrin Vs Free Gingival Graft In improving Thin Gingiva In Aesthetic Region In Dental Implants Patients.

Comparative Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Tunnelling With Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Versus Free Gingival Graft (FGG) In Enhancing Thin Gingival Biotype In Aesthetic Region In Patients Undergoing Dental Implants - A Randomized Controlled Trial. - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/07/090124
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-07-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: PLATELET RICH FIBRIN: Increasing the width of attached gingiva and gingival thickness in thin gingival biotype by Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF). Study will be for one year duration, maxim

Sponsors

Dr Pankaj Gangil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Thin gingival biotype in maxilla. 2.Healthy adults aged 18-60 years. 3.Aesthetic zone (including maxillary premolars). 4.Patients with good oral hygiene. 5.Patients who are willing to sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Gingival recession & bone loss 2.Smokers 3.Immunodeficiency, Autoimmune disorders 4.Patients with history of uncontrolled systemic diseases affecting the periodontium. e.g. Diabetes Mellitus etc. 5.Patients allergic to medications. 6.Patients suffering from Periodontitis. 7.Previous surgery in the area under study within last 6 months. 8.Those undergoing antibiotic therapy or have had in last 6 months. 9.Pregnant and lactating females. 10.Patient undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. 11.Patients with inflammatory/genetic bone disorders. 12.Patient with periodontal disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
FGG may give better results in terms of increasing KTW and gingival thickness as compared to PRF.Timepoint: Follow up at baseline, one , three and six months time interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pankaj Gangil

I.T.S. Dental College , Hospital and Research Centre

prin.dntl.gn@its.edu.in9910222799

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026