A study to evaluate the effectiveness of laser-assisted tooth whitening using a professional bleaching gel in adults, with color changes assessed through advanced artificial intelligence-based analysis.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Tooth Bleaching with Diode Laser using AI-Driven Colorimetric analysis- A Prospective Interventional Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/07/090115

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: AI Colorimetry Analysis: Certainly! Here is the **reframed version** of your sentence with improved clarity, flow, and sophistication: To evaluate the efficacy of tooth bleaching using

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with age 18 years to 45 years Both male and female in the study Patients with type 2 and type 3 modified deans fluorosis classification Patients having fluorosis and hypersentitvity with VAS score above 3 in the anterior region Patients residing in the fluoride belts region such as Rajasthan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient having a carious lesion in the anterior region patient with periodontal defects patient diagnosed with chronic generalized periodontitis patients having prosthesis in the anterior region such as crowns and veneers patients having Ellis fracture in anterior region patient having developmental anamolies such as amelogenesis imperfecta and dentinogenesis imperfecta

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Here s your revised text with improved clarity, structure, and a professional tone: There was a slight decrease in mean chroma observed three weeks post-operatively; however, this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.267). In contrast, the lightness (L value) showed a significant increase after the procedure (p = 0.00004), indicating a perceptible brightening effect of the teeth. Timepoint: Here is a polished and cohesive version of your results summary: There was a slight reduction in mean chroma following the procedure; however, this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.267). In contrast, a significant increase in lightness (L value) was observed post-operatively (p = 0.00004), indicating a marked improvement in tooth brightness after three weeks.	—

Measure

Time frame

Here s your revised text with improved clarity, structure, and a professional tone: There was a slight decrease in mean chroma observed three weeks post-operatively; however, this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.267). In contrast, the lightness (L value) showed a significant increase after the procedure (p = 0.00004), indicating a perceptible brightening effect of the teeth. Timepoint: Here is a polished and cohesive version of your results summary: There was a slight reduction in mean chroma following the procedure; however, this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.267). In contrast, a significant increase in lightness (L value) was observed post-operatively (p = 0.00004), indicating a marked improvement in tooth brightness after three weeks.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate the accuracy & reliability of the AI-driven application for colorimetry analysisTimepoint: Pretreatment & 3 weeks after posttreatment	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Panshul Kharche

NIMS Dental College

panshulkharche8@gmail.com8050497427

Outcome results