Skip to content

A Scientific Comparison of Pulp Treatment Materials in Childrens Teeth: Bioactive Glass, MTA Putty, and Biodentine

Comparative Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Bioactive Glass, MTA Putty, Biodentine As Pulpotomy Agents In Primary Molars: A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/06/089780
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-06-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: 1.Biodentine 2.Bioglass: This study is aimed to check the efficacy of new pulpotomy agents and compare them against standard gold regenerative agent. Two Intervention agents used bidode

Sponsors

Bhararti Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University dental college and hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy children between age 4-9 years will be selected for the study The clinical inclusion criteria selected for the study are as follows: 1. Vital primary molars with probable carious pulp exposure 2. Absence of spontaneous pain or persistent pain or nocturnal pain 3. No clinical symptoms or evidence of chronic irreversible pulpitis. 4. No history of swelling or sinus tracts. 5. Restorable tooth structure should be present 6. Haemorrhage from the amputation site is bright red and easy to control. Radiographic inclusion criteria were as follows: 1. Radiographic evidence of not more than one-third of physiologic root resorption 2. Absence of furcal and/or periapical radiolucency 3. Absence of radiographic evidence of internal or external root resorption 4. Absence of pathologic root resorption

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any clinical or radiographic inclusion criteria are not met 2. Children with systemic disorders or immunocompromised patients. 3. Remaining radicular tissue of the tooth was non-vital (suppuration/purulent necrosis) 4. Evidence of chronic irreversible pulpitis. 5. Haemostasis could not be achieved within 5 minutes by direct contact with a wet cotton pellet, prior to material placement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome includes clinical and radiographic assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months. Clinical success: no pain, swelling, tenderness, abscess, fistula, mobility, or early exfoliation. Radiographic success: normal PDL space, no periapical/furcal radiolucency, and no root resorption. Timepoint: Time points Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be carried out at intervals or time points of 1,3,6 months. The clinical examinations will be performed according to criteria of clinical success, and radiographic examinations according to radiological criteria as mentioned in the prior column .

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Pain after the procedure 2.Handling properties of the material 3.Time required to complete the procedure 4.Patient or parent satisfaction 5. Incidence of complications or need for retreatmentTimepoint: at followup of 1month 3month 6month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shradha Akolkar

Bhararti Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University dental college and hospital

shwetadixitchaudhary@gmail.com9665113526

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026